Legal Opinion

United States v. Eastland

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 8, 1988No. 87 CR 948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Currently before the Court is Joseph Patrick Eastland’s motion to declare the new Sentencing Guidelines unconstitutional. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the Sentencing Guidelines are invalid under the non-delegation theory or, alternatively, as an excessive delegation. *

As of July 20, 1988, 141 opinions or orders had been issued by various district courts around the country concerning the constitutionality of the Sentencing Guidelines. On different bases, a majority, 79-62, have found the Sentencing Guidelines…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. DahlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  2. United States v. FranzDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  3. United States v. DahlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  4. United States v. SchetzDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API