United States v. Franz
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZAGEL, District Judge.
The defendant here challenges the sentencing guidelines put forth by the United States Sentencing Commission under the authority of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (28 U.S.C. § 991 et seq.). This court is obliged to sentence this defendant in accordance with the guidelines (18 U.S.C. § 3551 et seq.) unless doing so would violate the Constitution. In his behalf defendant has, with leave of court, adopted as his own the arguments advanced by Joseph Patrick Eastland in United States v. Eastland, 694 F.Supp. 512 (N.D.Ill.1988). Most of the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. JimenezDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989