Legal Opinion

United States v. Schetz

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 3, 1988No. 87 CR 981-4Published

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.

All defendants have either pleaded guilty or been convicted at trial, and now face sentencing under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (“the Sentencing Act”), Pub.L. No. 98-473, 98 Stat. 1837, codified at, 28 U.S.C. § 991 et seq. The Act requires this court to sentence them under the Sentencing Guidelines promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission, see 18 U.S. C. § 3553, unless doing so would violate the Constitution. Defendants insist that it would, and thus move this court to invalidate the guidelines and sentence…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API