Thrush v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Presiding Judge.
This appeal is taken from a conviction for being an accomplice to robbery by assault, wherein the jury assessed the punishment at confinement in the Texas Department of Correction for twenty (20) years.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. Suffice it to say the record reflects that appellant advised and aided in the robbery of Jack Boozer, an employee at a coin shop in Waco, on March 8, 1972, wherein rare coins were taken.
Appellant’s first ground of error complains of the trial court’s refusal to grant his motion for continuance. Initially, we…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Benoit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Siqueiros v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Kemner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.