Legal Opinion

Thrush v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 23, 1974No. 48684PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is taken from a conviction for being an accomplice to robbery by assault, wherein the jury assessed the punishment at confinement in the Texas Department of Correction for twenty (20) years.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. Suffice it to say the record reflects that appellant advised and aided in the robbery of Jack Boozer, an employee at a coin shop in Waco, on March 8, 1972, wherein rare coins were taken.

Appellant’s first ground of error complains of the trial court’s refusal to grant his motion for continuance. Initially, we…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Benoit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Siqueiros v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Kemner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API