Legal Opinion

Sinka v. Northern Commercial Company

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1971No. 1360, 1361PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

These are actions to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from an alleged breach of warranty in the sale of goods. The sole question before us is whether the two-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions applies. If so, the plaintiffs are barred, as these actions were brought more than two years after the sale. Plaintiffs assert a right to bring suit under the four-year period of limitation contained in the Uniform Commercial Code.

In one complaint it is alleged that Josephine Tucker, of Emmonak, Alaska, purchased what she believed to be pearl…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Gardiner v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Mendel v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Val Decker Packing Company, a Corporation v. Corn Products Sales Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Garcia v. Texas Instruments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Parish v. B F Goodrich Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Redfield v. Mead, Johnson & CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API