Legal Opinion

Thomas M. Roth v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1964No. 7687PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

This is a direct appeal from a sentence imposed after a jury verdict of guilty. The indictment names 8 defendants and has 13 counts, each of which charges the uttering of false documents and the making of false statements to influence the action of the Federal Housing Administration in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1010. Each count also charges the violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2, the general aiding and abetting statute. Appellant Roth and Margery Kincheloe were named as defendants in every count. One Venable was named in Counts I, II, and III. The remaining 5 defendants…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  4. Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. DickeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Walt Anthony Sturmoski, A/K/A Anthony W. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. SmaldoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API