Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 11, 1983No. WD 33380PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRITCHARD, Judge.
State Farm was successful in the trial court in seeking pro rata compensation from Hartford for $75,000 paid by State Farm in settlement of a claim for personal injuries against one Bates, its named insured, and for $3,593.45 for expenses and attorney fees on the theory that Hartford was a co-insurer of Bates under a policy issued to him. The trial court entered judgment against Hartford for $38,719.69 and post-judgment interest.
Hartford had issued an automobile insurance policy to Bates for one year beginning February 11, 1973, specifically covering a 1969 GMC pickup and a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. HaasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Martinelli v. Security Insurance Co. of New HavenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Missouri Managerial Corporation v. PasqualinoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Kammeyer v. Concordia Telephone CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Blew v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Albany County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Tate v. Charles Aguillard Ins. & Real Est.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Design Data Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Silverton Enterprises, Inc. v. General Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ZumwaltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.