Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Maggio

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 30, 2012No. 2011-433PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

¶ 1. Rosann Maggio, widow and primary beneficiary of the estate of Daniel Maggio, appeals a decision of the superior court holding that Daniel Maggio did not own an interest in real property in Holland, Vermont at the time of his death. Ms. Maggio argues that the trial court erroneously admitted statements from her interrogatory answers in violation of the best evidence rule, the dead man’s statutes, and the requirement in V.R.E. 602 that testimony be based on personal knowledge; that the court’s conclusions that the property in question was partnership property and that Daniel Maggio ceded…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. Richard Scott McLernon Kido Yaqui, Sherri Louise Farrell, Miguel Angel Carranza, and Marco Antonio Valdez-CotaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. George Lindemann, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Crowe v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re Margaret Susan P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clifton G. Valentine v. Sugar Rock, Inc. and Gerald D. and Teresa D. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. Porter, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. Hayes and Hayes-McGraw v. Town of Manchester Water & Sewer Boards and Mountain View Estates Homeowners AssociationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. State v. Shannon C. BarrySupreme Court of Vermont · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API