Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Scott McLernon Kido Yaqui, Sherri Louise Farrell, Miguel Angel Carranza, and Marco Antonio Valdez-Cota

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1984No. 19-3006PublishedCited by 163 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Marco Antonio Valdez-Cota (Valdez), Miguel Angel Carranza-Baez (Carranza), Kido Yaqui (Yaqui), Richard Scott McLernon (McLernon) and Sherri Louise Farrell (Farrell) appeal their jury convictions in these consolidated cocaine conspiracy cases. Upon careful consideration of the myriad issues presented by their appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded in part, with instructions consistent with this opinion.

In 1974, agent Charles Hamlin of the Drug Enforcement Administration…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by163 opinions

  1. State v. ShuckTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. United States v. Roy C. Blakeney (90-5664), Kenneth A. Kutnyak (90-5665), and James E. Box (90-6041)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. State of New York v. Hendrickson Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. GendronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. DeFries, Clayton E.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API