Senitha v. Robertson
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRONER, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a final decree entered by the District Court of Maryland on the 10th of April, 1929, setting aside a decree pro confesso, and dismissing the bill of complaint.
On February 11, 1928, pursuant to section 4915, Rev. St., as amended by Act March 2,1927, § 11 (35 USCA § 63), appellant filed a bill of complaint on the equity side of the District Court of Maryland against the Commissioner of Patents praying for a decree directing the Commissioner to issue to him a patent in accordance with an application which had theretofore been filed in the Patent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Butterworth v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Consolidated Stone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Radtke Patents Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Standard Stoker Co. v. LowerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1931
- Bavouset v. Shaw's of San FranciscoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1967
- Nesbitt Fruit Products, Inc. v. WallaceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1936
- Vogel v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.