United States Ex Rel. Maxwell v. Gilmore
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Andrew Maxwell (“Maxwell”) has filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section 2254”) petition for a writ of habeas corpus (“Petition”). Maxwell challenges both his murder conviction and the consequent death sentence and seeks an evidentiary hearing to consider that challenge. For the reasons stated hereafter, this Court denies the Petition in principal part but grants certain aspects of Maxwell’s requests for an evidentiary hearing and for the opportunity to conduct discovery.
Facts
Under Section 2254(e)(1) 1 the state court’s findings of fact are…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. OrangeIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Moore Ex Rel. Estate of Jones v. BurgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Andrews v. BurgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.