Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Maxwell v. Gilmore

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 9, 1999No. 96 C 6445PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Andrew Maxwell (“Maxwell”) has filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section 2254”) petition for a writ of habeas corpus (“Petition”). Maxwell challenges both his murder conviction and the consequent death sentence and seeks an evidentiary hearing to consider that challenge. For the reasons stated hereafter, this Court denies the Petition in principal part but grants certain aspects of Maxwell’s requests for an evidentiary hearing and for the opportunity to conduct discovery.

Facts

Under Section 2254(e)(1) 1 the state court’s findings of fact are…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. OrangeIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Moore Ex Rel. Estate of Jones v. BurgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Andrews v. BurgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  4. People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API