Legal Opinion · Dissent

Michelle Maliniak v. City of Tuscon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 9, 2015No. 12-17763Unpublished

1DissentHawkins, Senior Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. The totality of the circumstances test for evaluating relatedness is inconsistent with our precedent in Porter v. California Department of Corrections, 419 F.3d 885 (9th Cir.2005). While the majority’s approach may be preferable to our current rule, its adoption here would actually weaken Maliniak’s claim.

*629Unlike other courts that have adopted a totality of the circumstances test,1 the Ninth Circuit evaluates relatedness based on particular factors: “[t]hus, to determine whether all of these events constitute ‘one unlawful employment practice,’ we consider whether they…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Lawana Porter v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Baird v. GotbaumCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  4. Stewart v. Mississippi Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. Duncan v. Manager, Department of SafetyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API