Anderson v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

OPINION

FROEB, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board which held that appellant was discharged for misconduct in connection with employment and that appellant was disqualified from the receipt of unemployment compensation benefits. The issue on appeal is whether the appeals board correctly defined “misconduct” under current Arizona unemployment compensation law. We hold that it did and affirm the decision of the appeals board.

FACTS

Appellant, Robert C. Anderson, was employed at Motorola, Inc. from January 1974, until he was terminated from…