Legal Opinion
Smith v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1936No. 5131PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALIAFERRO, Judge.
On December 9, 1929, defendant issued to plaintiff a policy contract in which it is stipulated that, if before attaining the age of 60 years, and while the policy is in force, the insured shall furnish to the insurer due proof that he is totally and permanently disabled, as therein defined, certain benefits would be granted to him during the remainder of his lifetime, so long as such disability continued. To entitle the assured to the benefits referred to, disability must be of the character defined in the following stipulations in the policy:
“Section 3 — Benefits in Event…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crowe v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Manuel v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Phillips v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Cates v. New York Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Cates v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clark Ray Helms and Betty Helms v. Monsanto Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Harris v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Negem v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Landry v. Mutual Life Ins.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1944
- Link v. New York Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.