Jackson v. State ex rel. Lindley
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Howard Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The complaint, the sufficiency of which is challenged by demurrer, seeks to enforce the collection of an assessment for the construction of a ditch.
It is not averred in the body of the complaint, that the appellant had notice of the proceedings, or that any notice whatever was given, and for this reason the appellant’s counsel insist that the court erred in overruling the demurrer.
*251The appellee attempts to parry the attack by the argument that the proceedings are set forth as an exhibit, and it there appears that notice was given. We do not think the appellee’s position can be maintained. It…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McKinsey v. BowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Shaw v. State ex rel. WhitmoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Wishmier v. State ex rel. DickeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Crist v. State ex rel. WhitmoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- State ex rel. Mayfield v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jackson v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Kuntz v. SumptionIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Pickering v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Ross v. MenefeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Laverty v. State ex rel. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.