Legal Opinion

McKinsey v. Bowman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

-.Biddle, C. J:

Petition by the appellee, to the hoard of-commissioners of' Clinton county, ■ filed at their special térm, March, 1875, to establish a drain. From the date when the proceedings were commenced, they must have been based upon the act of March 11th, 1867, 3 Ind. Stat., p. 228. By the act of March 9th, 1875, 1 R. S. 1876, p. 428, the whole subject was reenacted. The later act, however, does not repeal the former, but enacts, that “ The provisions of this act ’ shall not be so construed as to repeal any law of this State now in force to encourage the construction of levees, dikes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. PriceIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Baker v. Arctic DitchersIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Bate v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Coolman v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Frazer v. BossIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Corey v. SwaggerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Trittipo v. BeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Bohr v. NeuenschwanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API