Marino v. Bowers
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLO VITER, Circuit Judge.
I
The issue on appeal in this case is whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 96 S.Ct. 2673, 49 L.Ed.2d 547 (1976), should be applied retro-. actively. The district court held that it should not, and dismissed appellant’s complaint. We find that the court correctly applied the retroactivity factors enumerated in Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97, 92 S.Ct. 349, 30 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971), and affirm.
II
A
Appellant Nicholas D. Marino was hired by the Board of Commissioners of Bucks County, Pennsylvania (hereafter Board) in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Laskaris v. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Grigoletti v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Farber v. City of PatersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Perez, John T. v. Dana Corporation, Parish Frame Division and United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 3733Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.