Legal Opinion

Grant v. Alaska Industrial Board

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided July 25, 1947No. 5671-APublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLTA, District Judge.

The defendant Milner is engaged in supplying janitorial services to the public. On January 21, 1947, in connection with cleaning rugs, upholstering etc., which had been soiled by smoke and soot, he hired the deceased, Robert Grant, to instruct him in the use of the cleaning agent, carbon tetrachloride. Two days later Grant became ill, and his death on January 31st was attributed to carbon tetrachloride poisoning.

On March 25th the Alaska Industrial Board denied the widow’s application for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Chapter 9, S.L.A.1946. Its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. Humboldt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Pabst Corp. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. HunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Comerford v. CarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. Scott v. Alaska Industrial BoardDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
  3. Alaska Mines & Minerals, Inc. v. Alaska Industrial BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Alaska Mines & Minerals, Inc. v. Alaska Industrial BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Amended August 2, 2017 Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API