Legal Opinion
Scott v. Alaska Industrial Board
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided September 15, 1954No. 6987-APublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
The plaintiff has appealed from an award of the Alaska Industrial Board on the ground that he is entitled to compensation for temporary disability for a longer period than that allowed. The defendant Columbia Lumber Company, alleging that it has overpaid the plaintiff for such disability, has interposed a counterclaim for the amount of the alleged overpayment, which the plaintiff has moved to strike.
A disposition of the question presented by the motion to strike involves an analysis of the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act governing the review of the orders of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bassett v. Massman Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Associated Indemnity Corporation v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Grant v. Alaska Industrial BoardDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1947
- Hemmingson v. Libby, McNeil & LibbyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- Interior Paint Company v. RodgersAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Aleutian Homes v. FischerAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Alaska Mines & Minerals, Inc. v. Alaska Industrial BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
- Kiser v. Bartley Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Alaska Mines & Minerals, Inc. v. Alaska Industrial BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.