Legal Opinion
Hill v. McMartin
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 9, 1977No. Civ. A. 7-70267PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Joe Hill, Robert Wayne Hill, and L. J. Pittman bring this lawsuit seeking the return of approximately $63,000 admittedly taken from their possession in the course of a search of an automobile owned by L. J. Pittman and occupied at the time by the two Hill brothers. Plaintiffs also seek actual and punitive damages for false arrest, and ridicule and scorn they claim they were subjected to in the course of the search, the arrest, and their subsequent efforts to obtain the return of their $63,000.
It is undisputed that the Hill brothers had driven to Boyer Bracey’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gordon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Hohri v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- McKenzie v. CallowayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
- Community Brotherhood of Lynn, Inc. v. Lynn Redevelopment AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.