Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Ambassador Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1988No. Docket 90697PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHood, P.J.

Intervening defendants, cross-plaintiffs, counter-plaintiffs-appellants, Sonya R. Wise and Ben R. Torian (intervenors), appeal by leave granted from the decision of the Ingham Circuit Court in favor of plaintiffs-appellees, the Attorney General and the Commissioner of Insurance. The Ingham Circuit Court held that the intervenors were not able to satisfy their default judgment against defendant-appellee Ambassador Insurance Company from a special deposit made by Ambassador with the State of Michigan, despite an order of the 36th District Court compelling the insurance commissioner to turn the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rutter v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Shane v. HackneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Mary v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Earl Dubey & Sons, Inc. v. MacOmb Contracting Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Ace Grain Co. v. Rhode Island Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re WaiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Frank v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. (In Re Thompson Boat Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
  3. Department of Transportation v. American Motorists InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. In Re WaiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API