Legal Opinion

C. J. Shoaf & Co. v. Frost

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was an appeal from ail order of Starbuek, ./., at Pall Term, 1897, of Davie County, sustaining an exception to the allotment of homestead Commissioners and ordering a new allotment. The facts appear in the. opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Faircloth, C. J.:

Under proper proceedings appraisers were appointed to lay off the defendant’s homestead, which they did, describing the assigned premises by metes and bounds, and valued the same at $1,000. The plaintiffs excep.ted to the appraisers’ return and a jury trial was had under The Code, Sec. 519, and the amendatory Act of 1885, Chapter 347, and in response to the issues they found as a fact that the land allotted as aforesaid was worth $2,000. An appeal wras taken and this Court held that the valuation fixed by the jury was final, and the commissioners appointed to make a second…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Vanstory v. . ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shoaf v. Frost.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Shoaf & Co. v. FrostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API