Mayotte v. U.S. Bank National Association
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge., On this appeal the parties have asked us to determine how, or even whether, an important—but subtle and often confusing—doctrine limiting federal-court jurisdiction should apply to a unique Colorado procedure for “nonjudicial” foreclosure of mortgages. The jurisdictional doctrine is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which forbids lower federal courts from reviewing state-court civil judgments. Colorado’s unique procedure is Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure 120, which requires creditors pursuing nonjudicial foreclosure to first obtain a ruling by a Colorado trial court that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Campbell v. City of SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Aneta Hadzi-Tanovic v. Robert JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Bruce v. City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
- Brickert v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- John Williams v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New MexicoBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Balmer Fund, Inc. v. City of HarperDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.