Brickert v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company's Motion to *1133Dismiss Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"). ECF No. 23. Defendant argues this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and Younger abstention doctrine. Defendant also argues that issue preclusion prevents Plaintiff from challenging the validity of the underlying foreclosure at issue in this case. Finally, Defendant argues that even if the Court were to reach the merits of Plaintiff's claims, each claim should be dismissed under Fed.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Banks v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- C & M Resources, LLC v. Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- Ezedinma v. Douglas County District Court - Division 7District Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- FW-CO, Inc. v. SchulzDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- FW-CO, Inc., d/b/a FORTIS v. CHARLES SCHULZ, DAVID SCHUPMANN, and TRIDENT SOLUTIONS OF SUGAR GROVE, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.