Legal Opinion

Scheve v. Heiman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1935No. 32,400PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover damages resulting from a collision of automobiles, and from a judgment in favor of plaintiff the defendant appeals, claiming the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in his favor on account of plaintiff’s contributory negligence, in refusing to give to the jury requested instructions, and in giving the instructions that were given.

The motion for an instructed verdict is based on the claim that plaintiff’s evidence showe'd him guilty of negligence which contributed to his damage and precluded his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Hudson-Brace Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. Koger v. KellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sams v. Commercial Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Siegrist v. WheelerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. Fry v. CadleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Burton v. MoulderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Blankenship v. FrakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API