Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Fraker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1952No. 38,562PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This was an action to recover for personal injuries and property damage sustained when an automobile and a motor truck collided at the intersection of two city streets. The plaintiff recovered and the defendant has appealed on grounds that the trial court erred (1) in overruling his demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence and (2) in overruling his motion for judgment on answers returned by the jury to special questions notwithstanding its general verdict.

Except as they define the issues the pleadings are of no importance and require little…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Fry v. CadleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Modlin v. Consumers Cooperative Ass'n.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Picou v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Roddy v. Hill Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cain v. SteelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Kendrick v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Messinger v. FultonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Siegrist v. WheelerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Briggs v. BurkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API