Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Weber & Linn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNER, A. C. J.

This is a suit for the partition of 17 acres of real property in Clackamas county, Oregon. It is instituted by the plaintiffs, George E. Bingham and his wife Laura, against the defendant, Amalie Weber, a widow. During the course of the trial, it was stipulated that the defendants Linn were neither necessary nor proper parties. From a decree adjudging Mrs. Weber to be the owner of the entire fee in the property and an order dismissing the Binghams’ complaint, the plaintiffs appeal.

All the parties claim their respective titles or color of title through heirs of Joseph Schmidt,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dean v. DeanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Treadgold v. WillardOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Reed v. HollisterOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Wyman v. HagemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Jobse v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. JARVIS ET UX v. Indemnity Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Fry v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. A.I. Credit Corp. v. GohresDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
  4. Hein v. ThielOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. JARVIS ET UX v. Indemnity Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API