Legal Opinion

Hein v. Thiel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action to enforce an oral agreement for the division of the assets of a corporation in a proportion different than the respective stockholdings of the parties to that agreement. As a party to that agreement plaintiff seeks to enforce it against defendant, as the personal representative of the estate of the other party to the agreement. Defendant appeals from a judgment based upon an adverse jury verdict.

1. The sufficiency of the evidence of the oral agreement.

Defendant’s primary contention is that the trial court erred in denying her motions for a directed verdict and for a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morphet v. MorphetOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Rogue River Management Co. v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bailey v. SteeleOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Fay v. McConnellOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Houston v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harmon v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Johnson v. MandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Aylett v. MardisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API