Legal Opinion

San Jose Mercury News, Inc. v. Criminal Grand Jury

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 2004No. H026796PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

I. Introduction

After a witness has testified before the Criminal Grand Jury in Santa Clara County (Grand Jury), the foreperson gives the witness the following admonition: “You are admonished not to reveal to any person, except as directed by the court, what questions were asked and what responses were given or any other matters concerning the nature or subject of the grand jury’s investigation which you learned during your appearance before the grand jury unless and until such time as the transcript of this grand jury proceeding is made public. Violation of this admonition is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. People v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API