Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 28, 2005No. Nos. 53322-3-I; 53875-6-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 “ ‘Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ’,1 Whether one convicted of a crime was on community placement at the time of the offense is a fact that does not fall within the narrow exception of a “prior conviction” for purposes of Blakely v. Washington.2 Because the offender scores of Darrell Jones and Reginald Thomas were improperly based on judicial findings of fact that they were on community placement at the time of their current…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API