Legal Opinion
Taha v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 6, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-7224PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint alleging violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“I.N.S.”), the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education, 1 the “United States Department of Post Secondary Education,” 2 “Deputy Read Wallace,” 3 and John F. Morris, Financial Aid Director at Temple University.
The Immigration and Naturalization Service and the United States Department of Education (the “federal defendants”), and defendant Temple University, now have both moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- J. Donald GOODWIN, Appellant, v. ELKINS & CO., Robert G. Hayden, Richard Sichenzio, and Gabriel F. Nagy, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- D.P. Enterprises, Inc. v. Bucks County Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- John A. GUY, Appellant, v. SWIFT AND COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Provident National Bank v. Frankford Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Diceon Electronics, Inc. v. Calvary Partners, L.P.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gundlach v. ReinsteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Miller v. Group Voyagers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Sterling v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Warminster Township Municipal Authority v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.