Legal Opinion

Seno v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 18, 1991No. 14196PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether a person sentenced to a term of imprisonment exceeding five years must be incarcerated for five calendar years in order to earn statutory good time1 at the rate of twelve days per month pursuant to General Statutes § 18-7a (c).2 The petitioner, Michael Anthony Seno, Sr., *271appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the trial court should have determined that the respondent, the commissioner of correction, failed to calculate properly the amount of statutory good time that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  4. Holmquist v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Nichols v. WarrenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Velez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Tyson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Whitaker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Steve v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API