Bischof v. Mikels
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.
Appellant sued Franklin Mikels, Joseph A. Storms and Armstrong Ross upon an in*116clemnity bond. Subsequent to the commencement of the action Ross died, and the appellee, Franklin Mikels, having been appointed his administrator, was substituted as defendant in his place ás such administrator, while he still remained a defendant in his individual capacity. •
It appears from the complaint that on the day the bond was executed, December 4, 1893, the defendants, Mikels and Storms owned certain real estate in Chicago; that prior thereto, to-wit: on May 27, 1893, a former owner of the real estate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Scherer v. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Taylor v. DuesterbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rhoades v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. CharmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. CregorIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Michigan Trust Co. v. ProbascoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.