Legal Opinion

McCanless, Com'r v. Klein

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1945PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Klein is a wholesale liquor dealer in Memphis. His license was suspended for a period of six months by the Commissioner of Finance and Taxation for violation of a regulation promulgated by-the commissioner, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:

“Prom and after the effective date of this regulation no wholesale liquor distributor shall add an additional brand to his stock without first securing the written approval of the Commissioner.”

On the bearing before the commissioner, in response to an inquiry, counsel for Klein stated that no question was made that this regulation (Number 36)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Wilson v. BushTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Wright v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In re CuddebackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. State Ex Rel. Saperstein v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. McIntyre v. TraughberCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. State v. CopelandTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Boyce v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Perry v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API