Legal Opinion

City of Stow v. City of Cuyahoga Falls

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1982No. 10458PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVictor’, J.

This action for declaratory judgment was brought on behalf of nine Stow property owners whose properties lie along the north side of Graham Road. The city of Cuyahoga Falls installed a water line along the north side of Graham Road in what was then the village of Stow. Some property owners along the north side of Graham Road were permitted to tap into this water line years ago. The property owners bringing this action were not permitted to tap into the line. The city refused the request to tap in solely on the administrative policy, determined by the mayor, that properties located outside the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Indian Hill Acres, Inc. v. KelloggOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Shipman v. Lorain County Board of HealthOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Joslyn v. AkronSummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andres v. City of PerrysburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Robert G. Sproul v. City of WoosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. Robert G. Sproul v. City of WoosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. Robert G. Sproul v. City of WoosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API