Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Joslyn v. Akron

Summit County Court of Common Pleas

Decided January 15, 1958No. 205449PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By CLANDE V. D. EMMONS, J.:

It is stipulated that the City of Akron owns and operates its own Municipal Water Plant; that it has entered into a contract to sell water to the Chrysler Plant in Twinsburg Township, located in the extreme northerly part of Summit County, Ohio; that permission for the construction of this water line in the highway was granted both by Summit County and Twinsburg Township; that the Chrysler Corporation is a private Company primarily engaged in the manufacture of automobiles; that the water that the City of Akron agreed to furnish Chrysler is a surplus product;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Britt v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. City of Stow v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API