Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Bearce

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1920No. Civ. No. 2168PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The appeal is from the judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff by the superior court of San Joaquin County. The defendant Bearce was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $2,958.68, evidenced by his promis sory note in that amount, dated April 22, 1916, bearing interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum. Said note required the “interest to be paid annually, and if not so paid as it becomes due, to bear interest at the same rate as said principal sum, but if default be made in the payment of interest, then the principal sum of this note shall immediately become due at the option of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wetzel v. CaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barthelmess v. CavalierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Anderson v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Mann v. LeaskoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Bernstein v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Gribble v. MauerhanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API