Legal Opinion

State v. Pearson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1985No. 84-584PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

Following the affirmance by this court of defendant’s conviction for the felony offense of delivering cocaine, State v. Pearson, 215 Neb. 339, 338 N.W.2d 445 (1983), he filed a motion for post conviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. That motion was denied and he has appealed. We affirm.

As stated in State v. Pearson, supra:

Critical to the conviction of the defendant were two tape recordings of telephone conversations between the defendant and Paul R. Wagner, supervisor with the State Patrol drug division. Wagner testified in substance that he was acquainted with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. ReevesNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Grooms v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. HochsteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. MarcoNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. ClearNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. GrotzkyNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. MarcheseNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API