State v. Grotzky

Defendant, Harold J. Grotzky, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for post conviction relief and the denial of an evidentiary hearing thereon. The district court found that defendant was “entitled to no relief” and that “pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §29-3001 ... an evidentiary hearing in this matter is not required.” We affirm.

On February 15, 1984, an information was filed in Hall County District Court charging defendant with third offense driving while intoxicated on January 23, 1984, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Reissue 1984), and with driving a motor…