Vechery v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Bramhall, J.:
This appeal is based upon the refusal of the lower court to permit appellants to recover against appellee, — because of failure on the part of appellee’s insured to give notice of suit and to forward suit papers, — the amount of judgment by default obtained hy appellants against appellee’s insured.
The appellee had insured William J. McCabe (hereafter “William” or “insured”) against liability for damages arising out of automobile accidents. William was employed as an agent in the office of his father, John D. McCabe (hereafter “John”). John was licensed by appellee as agent for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Trentor v. PothenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Nathan Miller, Inc. v. Northern InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1944
- Nevil v. WahlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
- Aronson v. Frankfort Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Brooks Transportation Co. v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hecksher v. Fairwinds Baptist Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Bradford, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
- Rose v. Cadillac Fairview Shopping Center Properties (Delaware) Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1995
- ACE & Co., Inc. v. Balfour Beatty PLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2001
- Tydings v. LoewensteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.