Johnson v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Upon an appeal from a decree of the Franklin District Gourt.
1Opinion of the Court
In construing the entry on which the claim of the appellees is founded, several real difficulties arise. The first call — beginning one-half mile above the mouth of Grier’s creek — leaves it uncertain, whether half a mile from the mouth of that creek, or half a mile from its mouth on the water course into which it empties, or what particular point, was intended by the locator. But in the subsequent calls — to include both sides — and north for the largest part — Grier’s creek must necessarily be understood, no other object being named in the entry; so likewise Grier’s creek must be understood…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Prater v. PraterTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
- White v. BickfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Alfred Phosphate Co. v. Duck River Phosphate Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Graham v. StullTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
- Carrigan v. RowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.