Legal Opinion

National Life & Trust Co. v. Gifford

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1903No. Nos. 13,611—(55)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, Dickinson*. J., overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The court below overruled a general demurrer to the complaint in an action brought upon a promissory note executed and delivered by defendant, and made payable to the order of Mooney & Squyer. The plaintiff, a foreign corporation, failed to allege title to the note, unless the allegations in the complaint that “Mooney & Squyer indorsed the same without recourse,” and that plaintiff “is the owiier and holder thereof,” were sufficient for that purpose.

The drafting of a complaint in an action upon a promissory note is an exceedingly simple thing to do, and it is surprising that an insufficient…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. PeimeislSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Topping v. ClaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United Shoe Machinery Co. v. RamloseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Welsh v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API