Legal Opinion

360 Ranch Corp. v. R & D HOLDING

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1996No. 96-152PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

The respondent, 360 Ranch Corp. (“360 Ranch”), filed an action for declaratory relief in the District Court of the Eighteenth Judicial District in Gallatin County. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of 360 Ranch. The appellant, R & D Holding, appeals the order of the District Court. We reverse the District Court, and remand for resolution of the factual issues.

The issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred when it granted summary judgment in favor of 360 Ranch Corp.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In January 1994, 360 Ranch, as seller, entered into a land sale contract with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reaves v. ReinboldMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. D'AGOSTINO v. SwansonMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. O'BAGY v. First Interstate BankMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Whitehawk v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Payne Realty & Housing, Inc. v. First Security BankMontana Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Arrowhead Sch. Dist. 75, Park Co. v. KlyapMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Newbury v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Erker v. KesterMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Murphy Homes, Inc. v. MullerMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Town of Geraldine v. Montana Municipal Insurance AuthorityMontana Supreme Court · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API