Legal Opinion
Lane v. Gooding
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 15, 1917No. 8595PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error to Routt District Court, Hon. John T. Shumate, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Prior to January 5, 1914, A. M. Gooding and Arthur L. Wessels, defendants in error, were attorneys for the plaintiff in a case entitled Lane v. Lyon. On the date above mentioned the defendants in error filed in the same case a petition against both the plaintiff Lane and the defendant Lyon. The purpose of the petition, so far as it is now necessary to note, was to recover a certain sum of money, as attorney fees, and reimbursement for expenses, from the petitioners’ client, or former client, the plaintiff Lane.
In due course of these proceedings, Lane filed his separate answer, and Gooding and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pease v. State Ex Rel. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Wilcox v. JohnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cherry Creek School District 5 v. Voelker Ex Rel. VoelkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Butler v. FarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Rausch v. CozianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Gonzales v. HERRISSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Gallavan v. HoffnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.