Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Shinn

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 18, 2025No. 4:23-cv-00004Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 John Bernard Johnson, No. CV-23-00004-TUC-AMM 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 David Shinn, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 On February 19, 2025, Magistrate Judge Maria S. Aguilera issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending this Court deny Petitioner John Bernard 17 Johnson’s

28 U.S.C. § 2254

Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Doc. 24.) Johnson filed 18 a timely Objection to the R&R, and Respondents filed a Response. (Docs. 30–31.) For the 19 reasons discussed below, the Court will overrule…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API