Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 25, 1997No. 97-7016, 97-7017PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:

We are here asked to decide whether a victim of a privately executed wiretap1 can successfully move to quash a subpoena duces tecum directing the perpetrator of the wiretap to convey recordings of unlawfully intercepted communications to a grand jury. The district court denied the motions to quash. Since disclosure of the unlawfully intercepted communications to the grand jury would violate an explicit congressional prohibition, and enforcement of the subpoena would involve the courts in a violation of the victims’ statutory privacy rights, we will…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Bartnicki v. VopperSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. Supreme Court of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Chadwick v. JaneckaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  4. Peavy v. WFAA-TV, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Kai-Lo Hsu, A/K/A James Hsu. United States of America v. Chester S. Ho. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API