Legal Opinion

Bentley v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 20, 1941No. 5 Div. 337PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The plaintiff, appellee here, sued the defendants, appellants, joining in the complaint counts ex contractu and counts ex delicto, without averring that said counts related to the 'same subject matter, or that the cause of action arose out of the same transaction. The defendants’ demurrer pointed out this supposed defect relying on Cox v. Awtry, 211 Ala. 356, 100 So. 337, as supporting the demurrer. The holding in that case on this point was overruled by First Nat. Bank of Gadsden v. Morgan, 213 Ala. 125, 104 So. 403. The demurrer was properly overruled.

The appellants insist…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. F. Becker Asphaltum Roofing Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. First Nat. Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Joiner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. WalesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Minor v. ThomassonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darnell v. AlcornLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Tuscaloosa Motor Company v. CockrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Cobb-Kirkland Motor Company v. RiversCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API