Legal Opinion

Joiner v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1936No. 5 Div. 209PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Bill to abate a liquor nuisance, filed under the provisions of section 4671 et seq. and related sections 9290 and 9291 of the Code.

In our recent case of Ex parte Hill, 229 Ala. 501, 158 So. 531, it was held that the padlock provisions of section 9290 and the bond authorized by section 9291 of the Code are within the “general broad terms” of those applicable to liquor nuisances.

Section 4675 of the Code provides: “The owner of and all persons interested in the building or premises where the nuisance exists, or any agent renting the same, as well as the keeper thereof, may be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Montgomery v. McNuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Bank of Cottonwood v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Grossman v. United States ex rel. BrundageCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
  5. Hammock v. OakleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Whisenhant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  2. West v. State Ex Rel. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Trans-Lux Corp. v. State Ex Rel. SweetonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Taylor v. State Ex Rel. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. City of Birmingham v. Fairview Home Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API