Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 20, 1890PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Vilas, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

This action is brought to recover damages upon an injunction bond, being, as plaintiff claims, the amount of the expenses incurred by him for counsel fees, upon applications to set aside the preliminary injunction issued by the court in an action brought by defendant Shaw against this plaintiff, to restrain the enforcement of a certain judgment previously recovered by the plaintiff against him and others, and upon the trial of the principal action. The applications were denied, and the injunction retained until the trial, when the action was dismissed upon the motion of this plaintiff, upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bustamente v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Newton v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Frost v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Corcoran v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  5. New National Turnpike Co. v. DulaneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bergquist v. KreidlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Pelkey v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Village of Elbow Lake v. OTTER TAIL POWER COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Chicago, Anamosa & Northern Railway Co. v. WhitneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Nielsen v. City of Albert LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API