Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Murtha

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 12, 1993No. N-87-52 (PCD)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: LAUREL PARK COALITION MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT

DORSEY, District Judge.

The Murtha interests, consisting of family members and legal entities owned, controlled and operated by family members, owned two sites used for dumps, and contracted to accept waste and to haul waste generated by others to those sites. One site was Beacon Heights. The other site was Laurel Park. Waste from one source was not always deposited in the same site. Hazardous substances (“HS”), as now defined, were not excluded from either site. Congress required the Environmental…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Fischman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Conn.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
  3. B.F. Goodrich Co. v. MurthaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
  4. United States v. SerafiniDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. United States v. New Castle CountyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Prisco v. A & D Carting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Goodrich Corp. v. Town of MiddleburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Goodrich Corp. v. Town Of MiddleburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API